Re: Marinetti, CSA2 etc etc

[brian.hammack@rook.wa.com (Brian Hammack)]

 Adalbert replied to Richard:

 RB | You know, I was considering an 8 bit version of Marinetti. I was
    | even going to email you to see if you wanted to get involved.

 AG | Many people would like a 8 bit version.

<I've already replied to the 'Bev' reasons for not making an 8-bitter>

Here's my words of wisdom on an 8-bit Marinetti:  An 8-bit version
would be pretty cool.  The question then becomes about the applications
to use it.  Many of the items used for online functionality are 16-bit,
and some things aren't readily possible on a //e such as viewing a JPG.
How practical would an 8-bit Marinetti be considering the limitations?

If a functional package for the //e and //c can be created, then go for
it.  Even a Lynx clone is better than nothing.  :)

                                                        << mush >>

 * 2qwk! 2.04 * A cenobite is more like a troglodyte than a trilobite.