Re: Proterm is gone from Asimov!

[pfg@cs.rmit.edu.au (Paul Francis Gilbert)]

richard.b@genie.com (Richard Bennett) writes:

>In article <358AE53B.1232387@swbell.net>, rubywand@swbell.net wrote:

>> contact the Appleworks copyright owner, see if the owner cares, and
>> suggest that the owner contact Asimov. This is the standard procedure.

>Ruby short a brain cell, strikes again. InTrec and anybody else shouldn't
>have to ask. So, come on, tell us again...

Richard Bennett, the brainless twit, strikes again. As has been pointed out
several times, copyright law is a loaded gun for the *owner*. If InTrec,
or Apple, or whoever the hell owns Appleworks nows wants it removed it will
be. Simple.

Whever you disagree with Asimov or not, whether you think it's illegal or
not, you don't have *dick* rights to force Asimov to remove it. So tough.

Rubywand's suggestion is correct. If you care enough about it, contact the
copyright owner. But obviously you're more interested in flaming people than
protecting software.

--
Paul Gilbert           | pfg@yallara.cs.rmit.edu.au (The DreamMaster)
Bach App Sci, Bach Eng | The opinions expressed are my own, all my own, and
Year 5, RMIT Melbourne | as such will contain no references to small furry
Australia	       | creatures from Alpha Centauri.