[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Uploading a stack that would be controversal

Subject: Re: Uploading a stack that would be controversal
From: wsmith@NOSPAM.ctron.com (Will Smith)
Date: 1998/06/19
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: Cabletron Systems Inc.
References: <3589E7DA.F9BBD55C@concentric.net> <1998061905400600.BAA14122@ladder01.news.aol.com>

On 19 Jun 1998 05:40:06 GMT, cturley2@aol.com (Cturley2) wrote:

|>......   So, my suggestion is
|>just release it to public domain, be done with it and don't worry about it. 

the worst that would happen is Paramount would complain...  that might
be circumvented if the dox said that the original Star Trek portions
are copyrighted by Paramount Pictures, and that everything is used
without permission....  :)

---
William Smith
#include <disclaimer.h>
Remove the obvious when sending e-mail...

Bait: pyramid@ftc.gov  net-abuse@nocs.insp.irs.gov

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Uploading a stack that would be controversal
  - From: Slick <PAYSlick_RCBD@hotmail.com>

References:
- Re: Uploading a stack that would be controversal
  - From: Gabriel Morales <Togega@concentric.net>
- Re: Uploading a stack that would be controversal
  - From: cturley2@aol.com (Cturley2)

Prev by Date: Re: New Apple IIgs hardware? Maybe.
Next by Date: Re: Uploading a stack that would be controversal
Previous by thread: Re: Uploading a stack that would be controversal
Next by thread: Re: Uploading a stack that would be controversal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread