Re: Piracy and a new Appleworks

[spec@vax2.concordia.ca (Mitchell Spector)]

In article brian.hammack@rook.wa.com (Brian Hammack) writes...

> Rubywand replied to A2MG:
> 
>> Sure. There won't be an AppleWorks 5.2, and there won't be an Apple
>> Works 6.0.  How's that sound? Kind of makes you feel like you were
>> kicked in the stomach, doesn't it? Yep, me too..
> 
> R<|  1. Who is/was planning to release an "AppleWorks 5.2"?
> R<|  2. How, specifically, is piracy blocking the release?
> R<|  3. Who/where/what is the pirate?
> 
>And #4, what improvements could one make to AW 5.1 that would merit
>constructing 5.2 or higher?  I don't feel kicked in the stomach -- I'm
>using 4.3 and haven't seen a need to reach higher, pirated or not.

    I only felt kicked in the stomach when AppleWorks GS 2.0 was 
cancelled, especially after all the hype QC made surrounding it 
_and_ that list of new features that was made public.

Mitchell Spector
spec@vax2.concordia.ca