[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Boycott Microsoft

Subject: Re: Boycott Microsoft
From: nospamhattonr@aug.com (Rick)
Date: 1998/05/21
Newsgroups: alt.destroy.microsoft, comp.sys.apple2, alt.windows95, comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Organization: All USENET -- http://www.Supernews.com
References: <6jl2sl$l2p@news.or.intel.com> <6jpivp$ktp$1@nw001t.infi.net> <19980518190211204933@ts4-27.aug.com> <6jsfs1$5e2$1@gte2.gte.net> <35a272f8.215093847@news.supernews.com>

T. Max Devlin <mdevlin@eltrax.com> wrote:

> No there's not.  This is a fabrication.  Vendors have always enjoyed the
> freedom to make any desktop presentation they desire, though the OEM
> agreement may have language that requires them to install certain
> product components.

Read: http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/press_releases/1998press/1764.htm

Vendors have been prohibited from placing Icons on the desktop, and have
been forced to place an IE icon on the desktop.
-- 
***   To reply remove nospam from my return address.   ***

References:
- Re: Boycott Microsoft
  - From: nospamhattonr@aug.com (Rick)
- Re: Boycott Microsoft
  - From: roger@. (Roger )

Prev by Date: Re: ARM and 6502
Next by Date: Re: Test post, will be canceled ASAP
Previous by thread: Re: Boycott Microsoft
Next by thread: Re: Boycott Microsoft
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread