[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Boycott Microsoft

Subject: Re: Boycott Microsoft
From: jslewisspamlesswonder@erols.com (josh Lewis)
Date: 1998/05/14
Newsgroups: comp.sys.newton.misc, comp.sys.apple2, alt.windows95, comp.databases.informix, comp.sys.mac.advocacy, comp.databases.oracle.misc, comp.os.ms-windows.apps.financial, microsoft.public.inetserver.iis, microsoft.public.internnet.mail, alt.invest
Organization: none whatsoever
References: <35587D59.474A@nospam.com> <6jd8ah$cir$1@cdshub.cdc.com> <355A526A.4E21FDFD@delphi.com> <355AE992.E97@t-mobil.de>

In article <355AE992.E97@t-mobil.de>, Thomas Bregulla
<thomas.bregulla@t-mobil.de> wrote:

> Jeremy Crabtree wrote:
>  
> > Interesting...a moral defense for an immoral corporation...
> What makes me wonder is that you all say MS is immoral.
> MS is just a capitalistic company, right? - You are living
> in a capitalistic environment, right? - You feel well with this?
> 
> Good.
> 
> So what are you complaining? - They are just good in being capitalistic.
> They maximize and optimize their revenues - so what?

   They might be able to furter maximize revinues if they gave up the thug
thing and turned to selling crack.

   Would that be OK with you. I mean it still would be capitolism right?

References:
- Re: Boycott Microsoft
  - From: Thomas Bregulla <thomas.bregulla@t-mobil.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Titanic synthlab seq posted to comp.binaries.apple2
Next by Date: Re: Boycott Microsoft
Previous by thread: Re: Boycott Microsoft
Next by thread: Re: Boycott Microsoft
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread