[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Questions on Accelerators and RamWorks III

Subject: Re: Questions on Accelerators and RamWorks III
From: Steven Hirsch <snhirsch@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 07:16:23 -0400
In-reply-to: <j9KdncoWvub8j0zRnZ2dnUVZ5rKdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
References: <dog_cow-1288725959@macgui.com> <8d36f153-748e-4a37-b9c0-4e7f4d517115@e14g2000yqe.googlegroups.com> <j9KdncoWvub8j0zRnZ2dnUVZ5rKdnZ2d@giganews.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.0.10
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.sys.apple2:20844

On 11/03/2010 03:42 AM, Michael J. Mahon wrote:

 From my experience, only the first run of Zip Chips were unreliable--
the ones in which the tops of the two *packaged* SRAM chip packages are
visible on the underside of the Zip Chip seem reliable.

You lead a charmed life. All of mine have the packaged SRAM chips. All areflaky to one degree or another.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Questions on Accelerators and RamWorks III
  - From: Warren Ernst <wernst@gmail.com>

References:
- Questions on Accelerators and RamWorks III
  - From: dog_cow@macgui.com (D Finnigan)
- Re: Questions on Accelerators and RamWorks III
  - From: mdj <mdj.mdj@gmail.com>
- Re: Questions on Accelerators and RamWorks III
  - From: "Michael J. Mahon" <mjmahon@aol.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Questions on Accelerators and RamWorks III
Next by Date: Re: Questions on Accelerators and RamWorks III
Previous by thread: Re: Questions on Accelerators and RamWorks III
Next by thread: Re: Questions on Accelerators and RamWorks III
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread