Re: Asimov is *still* pirated material, supporters are liars

[jkfresh@wilbur.kemper.org]

In article <6hjc05$10r$1@client3.news.psi.net>,
  !smentzer@ecom.net (Steve Mentzer) wrote:
>
> Try deperately, but ultimately failing to sound intelligent, Nathan Mates
> said...
> >
>
> (most of the rant snipped)
>
> >
> >   You can show some of the slightest proof that you're changing by
> >realizing that these ARE pirate sites no matter how desperately you're
> >trying to hide the truth from your conscience, STOPPING referring to
> >pirate sites under any circumstances, and starting to ASK on Apple II
> >software for reclassification-- and if they author says NO, then that
> >software is NOT to be pirated under any circumstances.
That's a good idea... If the software is re-classified, then everybody
will be able to use it for free, but without breaking the law. Lots of
Times, people will release their software if asked...
>
> smentzer@ecom.net
>
>

-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/   Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading