Re: Of course we can trust Apple for our next OS!

[Ole Voss <joker@on-line.de>]

Edwin E. Thorne wrote:

> The Apple to Commodore analogy is like this:
>
> Apple II = C64
> AppleIIGS = C65
> Macintosh= Amiga
>
> There was no Commodore transition from the C64/C65 to the Amiga. No boards, no emulators, nothing to run C64/C65 stuff on the Amiga. Some third party emulators came along years later that were slower than a real C64 on a fast Amiga, and I've never seen a C65 emulator.
>
> On the other hand the C64 does have the advantage of still being in production.
>
> This message was created and sent using the Cyberdog Mail System

  You have GOT to be kidding! The C65 is definitely not in relation to the IIGS.
The C65 was crap... and the C64 was definitely no competition to the II!
We're talking Rolls Royce compared to Volkswagen here. In Germany the Cs were called the Volkscomputer - how's that...

ole

begin:          vcard
fn:             Ole Voss
n:              Voss;Ole
org:            Flaghunters
email;internet: joker@on-line.de
title:          Mr.
note;quoted-printable:Who am I to blow against the wind?=0D=0A=
	Someone had to reach for the rising star - I guess it was up to me.=0D=0A=
	You can stand me up at the gates of hell, but I won't back down!=0D=0A=
	There's so many different Worlds, so mayny different suns, and we have=
	 just one world...
x-mozilla-cpt:  ;0
x-mozilla-html: FALSE
version:        2.1
end:            vcard