[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Wozniak vs Jobs

Subject: Re: Wozniak vs Jobs
From: hattonr@aug.com (Rick Hatton)
Date: 1998/03/27
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: All USENET -- http://www.Supernews.com
References: <NZVQ.89$DF.359676@ptah.visi.com> <6f4q6e$58o@gap.cco.caltech.edu> <6f6tcg$1rti$1@news.gate.net> <1998032405291000.AAA09472@ladder03.news.aol.com> <Pine.SGI.3.91r.980324091332.3431A-100000-100000@freenet> <6fbkpr$sba$1@opal.southwind.net> <351A8F14.1599@library.ucla.edu> <6feeq7$3a4$1@elna.ethz.ch>

Henrik 'Ratte' Gudat <GUDATH@EZINFO.VMSMAIL.ETHZ.CH> wrote:

> Rhapsody is NextStep, so he did not only touch it, he created it. Apple is
> not pushing Rhapsody at this time for obvious reasons.

He did NOT create NextStep, he HIRED people to do it.

> Jobs is arrogant, self-centered, but he also has bright ideas. Anyone who
> > has been looking into NextStep will eventually agree.

See above. Jobs is just arrogant and self-centered.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Wozniak vs Jobs
  - From: GUDATH@EZINFO.VMSMAIL.ETHZ.CH (Henrik 'Ratte' Gudat)

References:
- Wozniak vs Jobs
  - From: nathan@visi.com (Nathan Mates)
- Re: Wozniak vs Jobs
  - From: toddpw@ugcs.caltech.edu (Todd P. Whitesel)
- Re: Wozniak vs Jobs
  - From: louiss@gate.net (Louis Schulman)
- Re: Wozniak vs Jobs
  - From: supertimer@aol.com (Supertimer)
- Re: Wozniak vs Jobs
  - From: "Greg J. Buchner" <buchner@freenet.msp.mn.us>
- Re: Wozniak vs Jobs
  - From: shack@onyx.southwind.net (Randy Shackelford)
- Re: Wozniak vs Jobs
  - From: pubpc1@library.ucla.edu
- Re: Wozniak vs Jobs
  - From: GUDATH@EZINFO.VMSMAIL.ETHZ.CH (Henrik 'Ratte' Gudat)

Prev by Date: Re: Diamond Mine :where are you?
Next by Date: Re: Punished for insolence
Previous by thread: Re: Wozniak vs Jobs
Next by thread: Re: Wozniak vs Jobs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread