[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Wozniak vs Jobs
- Subject: Re: Wozniak vs Jobs
- From: gr1071@aol.com (GR1071)
- Date: 1998/03/28
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
- References: <6fhkha$98e$2@opal.southwind.net>
GR1071 (gr1071@aol.com) wrote:
: >: Hmmm, I know it will cost me an arm and a leg, but *I* think that $teve
has
: >: deserved a few credits despite the fact he ripped off "our" Steve and
killed
: >: the A//.
: >How do you figure? He left Apple in '85, before there was a Mac Plus even.
: >Apple IIs were still going strong then.
: The magazine prose at that point in time used the phrase that the Apple II
was
: a "cash cow for the Mac." Monies made on Apple II sales were being diverted
: into Macintosh development not into the Apple II.
shack@onyx.southwind.net (Randy Shackelford) responded:
>Where do you think any company gets money for fielding new products? Hint:
>they don't pull it out of their asses, nor do they have a genie who grants
>wishes for money out of nowhere. I imagine everyone but militant Apple II
>users/Apple Inc. haters understand that revenue from existing products
>fuel development and marketing of new products.
This was a direct quote from the Apple II magazines from that time and may
or may not be my opinion. As others who were using the Apple II then will tell
you a vast majority of Apple II profits went into Mac development with no Mac
money going back into the Apple II.