[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Transwarp GAL chips
- Subject: Re: Transwarp GAL chips
- From: Rubywand <rubywand@swbell.net>
- Date: 1998/02/13
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: Southwestern Bell Internet Services, Richardson, TX
- References: <6bvf6q$c64$1@newssvr07-int.news.prodigy.com> <6c2dop$2q6q$1@newssvr04-int.news.prodigy.com>
- Reply-to: rubywand@swbell.net
Sandy writes ...
>
> Oh, I see...... The GAL's that were required to run the "OLD" high speed
> 65816 slow the processor down.
>
> So the old GAL's are (according to my theory) not slowing down the "NEW"
> high speed 65816
>
> And in fact, you would probably want the old GALs?
That was Ecitnerppa's idea, too. (Neat: "Ecitnerppa" is
"apprentice" spelled backwards!) A new vs. old speed comparison would
be fun. If, the old GALs introduce less delay and, as Todd notes, REP
and SEP are the main instructions affected, the old GALs would show
better speed; but, the difference would be very small.
Rubywand