[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What apple ][ is the best?
- Subject: Re: What apple ][ is the best?
- From: "Otter" <otter@oz.SpammersWillBeKilled&Eaten.net>
- Date: 1998/01/21
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: Sense Networking Seattle (http://www.oz.net)
On Tue, 20 Jan 1998 21:05:20 -0500,
mflynch <mflynch@msn.com> wrote:
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
>------=_NextPart_000_0075_01BD25E7.1E48C300
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary="----=_NextPart_001_0076_01BD25E7.1E48C300"
>
>
>------=_NextPart_001_0076_01BD25E7.1E48C300
>Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>What is the best kind of Apple II? (//, //+,//c, ect...)
>E-mail me at prodos3@geocities.com
>
>Tell me what you think
>
I'll give my opinions once you re-post your message without all that
HTML garbage. Usenet is for the most part an ASCII-dominated
component of the net.
--Otter
/* All email in HTML goes to the trash unread. */