Re: Nothin Mates; the Plagiarizer?

[nathan@visi.com (Nathan Mates)]

In article <19971208182601.NAA19897@ladder01.news.aol.com>,
LJSILICON <ljsilicon@aol.com> wrote:
>Is it possible that the Apple FAQs were restricted to some because
>the material included in them is plagiarized from old Apple
>programming manuals?  You know the ones; the ones that were
>distributed with the original Apple ][s and ][+'s.

   Given that I neither own those nor used anything from Apple other
than the Applesoft in the ROMs of my GSs to write that FAQ, I'd say
it's highly impossible, silly. But, hey, it's just like Turkeyites
like you to insinuate crap like that and never have to deal with the
little details like "reality." 

   If you want to talk copyright infringements, look at
http://ground.isca.uiowa.edu/apple2/Docs/DOS.3.3.ANATOMY/ -- although
Turkey credits a few books as sources, blindly digitizing all that
source is a *very* quick way to be copyright infringing, but I suppose
your lips are too firmly implanted on Turley's a** for you to be
intellectually honest about anything.

   Go back to the Apple II user group you destroyed with your
offensive personality. It was better for you to be a historical figure
of some merit than a pathetic wanna-be flamer with decade old software
written by you on your site, and only being able to link in the hard
work of others from the past few years. Give it up, your 15 articles
of fame in Nibble are way past.

Nathan Mates

--
<*> Nathan Mates http://www.visi.com/~nathan/      <*>
# This posting is copyright Nathan Mates, and may not be reprinted
# in full, partial, or quoted form on any archive site associated with
# Charles Turley.