[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why apple2

Subject: Re: Why apple2
From: shack@io.frii.com (Randy Shackelford)
Date: 1997/11/13
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: none
References: <sundog-1910970437280001@pm6ad.icx.net> <3461DC58.65F0@siemens.at> <34675aec.51294596@news.loop.com> <64cpke$gbf@login.freenet.columbus.oh.us>

In article <64cpke$gbf@login.freenet.columbus.oh.us>,
Dave Althoff <dalloff@freenet.columbus.oh.us> wrote:

>KCUF--Let me offer the following correction.  You should have said...
>
>: I couldn't agree more.  Computers are so BORING now.  The Apple II is logical
>: and beautiful.  I want to hug you for saying that!
>
>Note that the Apple ][ should *always* be referred to in the PRESENT
>tense, if not the FUTURE tense, not the PAST tense.

I dunno, since you can't exactly say this:

Apple IIs are available at your local Apple dealer.
--
Randy Shackelford                                 
shack@frii.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why apple2
  - From: "Todd S. Elliott" <eyeth@erols.com>
- Re: Why apple2
  - From: airmaster@KCUF.org (KCUF airmaster)

References:
- Why apple2
  - From: sundog@mailhub.icx.net (Jeffrey A. haun)
- Re: Why apple2
  - From: "Dr. Wolfgang Otrebski" <wolfgang.otrebski@siemens.at>
- Re: Why apple2
  - From: airmaster@KCUF.org (KCUF airmaster)
- Re: Why apple2
  - From: dalloff@freenet.columbus.oh.us (Dave Althoff)

Prev by Date: Re: Codename G-OS (NOW STOP IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
Next by Date: November preview of A2-2000 - 'Easter Egg Hunt'
Previous by thread: Re: Why apple2
Next by thread: Re: Why apple2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread