[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A Note to the FAQ Keeper (was Re: Nathan does it again!)



In article <bjblackbear-ya023680000510970750460001@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net>,
B.J. Major <bjblackbear@ibm.net> wrote:

>You are absolutely correct with the above two items.  Nathan is not doing
>either one.  Notice that Nathan has not addressed these items in any of his
>posts, either.  This entire "the FAQ is mine and I'll do what I want with
>it" has got to stop and I propose the following three suggestions:
>
>1.  Form a new csa2 group, and have it *moderated* (by someone other than
>Nathan obviously).

For the umpteenth time, this is NOT the way to go. Moderation sucks, plain
and simple. Killfiles are a much better way to filter out crap.

I noticed a new group named alt.fan.nathan on my host. I think all this
crap should be moved there and only people who want to read it will see it.

>2.  Institute a *total* boycott of Nathan's web site.  We all know where
>duplicates of the FAQ are now via FTP or otherwise, I'm sure we've all
>downloaded them for ourselves, so why do we do need to give his site any
>more hits.

I'm with ya there

>3.  I propose that someone who has a copy of the FAQ as it existed before
>Nathan took it over, sit down and do a complete forward read, comparing the
>old FAQ with the present one, to see exactly how much has been added and
>changed.  This is a standard proofreading technique and although it is time
>consuming, the results are obvious once it's done.  This is the only way
>we're going to know the complete differences between the two without taking
>anyone's word for it.

It would be handy to have an alternate FAQ without the inane editorial content
you find in the current one.

>In addition, about a year or so ago I saw the old FAQ (pre-Nathan) on a web
>site, so Nathan can not claim that he did the conversion to HTML format.  I
>am not sure if it is still there, but I know that I saw this once or twice
>and it was on the web when I did a search for "Apple II FAQ".

Dunno about that, never gave much notice until all the chest-thumping "read
section such-and-such in my FAQ" followups kept popping up in response to
people's questions.
-- 
Randy Shackelford                                 
shack@frii.com