Re: Binhex on IIgs?

[pubpc1@library.ucla.edu]

nathan@visi.com (Nathan Mates) wrote:
>   If reading comprehension is too hard for you, no wonder I have
>to correct the *facts* in just about every post of yours these days.
>You are no help at all if you're wrong.
>
>   And to those who wish this could be taken to email, lemme reiterate
>this: (1) Scott Gamon has no email address that he'll give out,
>preferring to hid behind anomymity to post his crap, and (2) If he
>bothered telling the truth and all the facts in the first place,
>there'd be no need to respond.

Nathan Mates, SHUT THE FUCK UP!

I'm fed up with your incessant whining.  You are NOT the end all
and be all of facts.

If you are so keen on facts, then let me ask you some questions.
Why did you say, as though it were fact, that DMA off results
in a sizable delay?  Why did you accuse others of "sour grapes"
when in fact in their system there was no significant delay?
Why do you assume that others see it the way you do?  Why do
you always say "I and others will slam you" when you are the
only one doing so?  Don't project your opinions on others.

Tip: assumptions are not facts.

You try to "correct" me on saying that DMA off results in no
noticeable delay, but you are WRONG if you have an Apple HS
card.  You also read most of my posts wrong and attack me
based on your erroneous assumptions (for example, you say
that I claim not to be able to hear 16-bit sound while I did
not say that).

What kind of Christian would jump to judge others, and
erroneously at that?

-Scott G.