In article<C87C44B8.1F1E4%ivanxqz@yahoo.com>,
Ivan X<ivanxqz@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 8/2/10 2:41 AM, in article
1jml6hr.5g039hzl514yN%spectrumdaddy@nospam.com, "Ewen"
<spectrumdaddy@nospam.com> wrote:
I always feel that the small Binary wrapper is of benefit if the file is
being downloaded with an application such as ProTerm or Spectrum, as
they will both then extract from the wrapper, and create the correct
filetype on disk.
So right, I see the benefits for users of programs such as those; but are
there any downsides for other users by providing BXY rather than SHK?
There shouldn't be...you can always use something like "dd bs=128 skip=1" to
remove the Binary II header from a file if it causes problems.
FWIW, the Apple II downloads on my website are all .BXY files, except for a
handful of files that aren't intended to be used on an Apple II (such as
source code that needs to be cross-compiled with cc65, for instance). The
importance of that header was drilled into me way back when I was
uploading/downloading files on GEnie, and it's stuck with me ever since.