Re: FS: APPLE IIGS

[shack@deimos.frii.com (Randy Shackelford)]

In article <3353CC96.7BDC@no.no>, Eric Jacobs  <no@no.no> wrote:
>
>Randy Shackelford wrote:
>> 
>> Followups set to csa2 only since I don't expect that anyone else wants to see
>> the normal amount of BS that a thread like this generates.
>
>huh. And what makes you think us csa2 readers would like to see it, now? Has this
>group really degenerated so much that the only threads with any zeal are these
>pointless arguments about why the Apple II is/is not a modern computer??

Seems like it has, doesn't it. I don't care to see this stuff either. You can
lay a large chunk of the blame at the feet of the original poster for posting
in comp.sys.mac.advocacy in this instance. Not too swift.

>This group is not for the "average computer user". This group is for Apple II
>enthusiasts, and to us what matters is the uniqueness of the Apple II, and not how
>it can or cannot compete with modern machines. Let's concentrate and what the Apple
>can do, rather than what it can't.

Agreed. So no more posting to inappropriate groups since you see the results.
It is dumb to argue with non enthusiasts, so I took out all the other groups.

>We're here to celebrate the Apple II, folks. Let's get started.

Not sure how a person celebrates an Apple II, but using, solving problems,
and exchanging ideas sounds about right.
-- 
Randy Shackelford                                 
shack@frii.com