Potato, Potato (was Re: not there yet (FAQ info))

[Toby Reiter <treiter@cs.oberlin.edu>]

On 3 Apr 1997, Nathan Mates wrote:

> In article <Pine.ULT.3.96.970402193351.14714B-100000@occs.cs.oberlin.edu>,
> Toby Reiter  <treiter@cs.oberlin.edu> wrote:
> >Just wanted to point out that Copy ][+ did not occur anywhere in Scott
> >G.'s post.
> 
>    Not the post I directly responded to, but Scott had made the claim
> that Copy ][+ 9.x could properly and safely remove resource forks from
> files a few days ago. I had not yet responded to it, and so I tied the
> two threads together, under the category of "misinformation that needed
> correcting." 
> 
>    Many people many multiple posts peer week in csa2. Please make
> sure you read them all before you criticize them.

Well, since, after a search in DejaNews, I was able to find the post
regarding Copy ][+, you are technically correct.  However, since my
statement, that Copy ][+ did not appear in Scott G.'s post, was also true,
I am also technically correct as well. ;)

Ah well....in any case Nathan, you're right, but in the future, you might
want to quote from the previous post, or simply respond directly to it,
just to make it a little less confusing (I can't always remember
everything that was said in a post, especially on something as relatively
obscure as this).

Toby