Re: Review - WordPerfect IIgs

[pubpc1@library.ucla.edu]

nathan@visi.com (Nathan Mates) wrote:
>In article <5e2d69$1s82@uni.library.ucla.edu>,
> <pubpc1@library.ucla.edu> wrote:
>>So far, we've only got mixed replies trying to get confirmation from
>>Corel.  When they get back to us (Bruce Maples, myself, and everyone
>>else who are bombarding them) with a statement that we can archive
>>together with the program, it will be uploaded to the regular ftp
>>sites and the binaries.  :)
>
>   Tip: read all of csa2 before posting, and hopefully you have a news
>server with article latencies under 12 hours. Turley posted yesterday
>that his earlier statements were (not unsurprisingly) wrong,
>Wordperfect is *still* copyrighted and not public domain.
>
>   Turley and the truth are rarely found together to begin with.

Usenet works in strange ways.  I'm seeing your reply and the one from
Washington Apple Pi before Dr. T's.

Of course I won't upload it when it is still freeware, but I'm going
to try to track down "Quality Software."  The web search engines are
no help.  Any hints on making them look for ONLY "Quality Software"
instead of everything with the words "Quality Software" in them?

The only way WP is going to get released is if we try to get it released.

I thought freeware does not equate to public domain?  :)

-Scott G.