[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Apple UniDisk 3.5 vs. Apple 3.5

Subject: Re: Apple UniDisk 3.5 vs. Apple 3.5
From: John Le Febvre <John@klatch.demon.co.uk>
Date: 1997/01/27
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: London
References: <pdueck-1901970157490001@dial1.pli.mb.ca> <5btikr$8la$1@europa.frii.com> <20760888wnr@klatch.demon.co.uk> <5c3unn$oiv$1@europa.frii.com>
Reply-to: John@klatch.demon.co.uk

In article: <5c3unn$oiv$1@europa.frii.com>  shack@deimos.frii.com (Randy Shackelford) writes:

[About Mac drives with UDC card etc]
> If you're gonna pick nits like this, why not go all out and talk about all the
> non Apple 3.5 drives which will and won't work.

I didn't intend it to be 'nit-picking', merely stating that the Mac
drives _will_ work on Apple IIs, even the 400K drive.

Apologies if this seems late.  My news server is 60 hours behind :(
-- 
John.
john@klatch.demon.co.uk

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Apple UniDisk 3.5 vs. Apple 3.5
  - From: "Russ Gibson" <russg@travsoft.com>

References:
- Re: Apple UniDisk 3.5 vs. Apple 3.5
  - From: shack@deimos.frii.com (Randy Shackelford)
- Re: Apple UniDisk 3.5 vs. Apple 3.5
  - From: John Le Febvre <John@klatch.demon.co.uk>
- Re: Apple UniDisk 3.5 vs. Apple 3.5
  - From: shack@deimos.frii.com (Randy Shackelford)

Prev by Date: Re: difference unidisk duodisk? and duodisk on IIc?
Next by Date: Re: Space Quest
Previous by thread: Re: Apple UniDisk 3.5 vs. Apple 3.5
Next by thread: Re: Apple UniDisk 3.5 vs. Apple 3.5
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread