[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Software license (was: Classic ripoffs in computing)
- Subject: Re: Software license (was: Classic ripoffs in computing)
- From: wivey@ix.netcom.com(William H. Ivey)
- Date: 1996/10/02
- Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers, comp.sys.apple2, comp.emulators.apple2
- Organization: Netcom
- References: <4tr6u6$75g@kannews.ca.newbridge.com> <51ahfc$avh@hecate.umd.edu> <52c9n0$m76@hecate.umd.edu> <324D910B.4BDF@wtgab.demon.co.uk> <52kc10$i6c@nntp.ucs.ubc.ca> <52pbkk$7kk@sun.rhrk.uni-kl.de> <52r6j9$a6h@nadine.teleport.com>
In <52r6j9$a6h@nadine.teleport.com> mattf@teleport.com (Matthew J.
Farrenkopf) writes:
>
>Let me mention Borland in this conversation. I recently purchased a
>software package from them. They explained their software license in
>English (wow!). They say (I'm paraphrasing) "This software may be
>used 'like a book.' That is, any number of copies may be made on as
>many systems as you want, so long as you can guarantee that no two
>people are using the software at the same time. Just like the idea
>that only one person may read a book at a time."
[...]
>I'm the only one who does any programming at home or at work. In
>addition, DOS mode is protected so that only the system administrator
>and I have access to it. He doesn't do any programming (well, at
>least in this language) either.
>
>Given the above, and what I understand from Borland's explanation: is
>it illegal to have a copy on my system and a copy on my work system?
Sounds like you're in compliance with both Borland's license and the
law (at least U.S. law which Borland seems to be basing their "license"
on - one of the clauses in U.S. copyright law supports the many-copies-
one-user-at-a-time idea).-Wm