Re: Disappointed by II-Alive editing

[rubywand@aol.com (RUBYWAND)]

In article <24SEP199620232329@vax2.concordia.ca>, spec@vax2.concordia.ca
(Mitchell Spector) writes:

>.... I don't feel my review 
>was "edited", more like it rewritten from scratch using my original 
>writing _only_ as a guideline as where to go. Only a few lines of my 
>original text seem to have survived, maybe 20%. I'm annoyed since not 
>only was wording changed, the editor added his/her own opinions which 
>conflict with mine! In some cases two or three entirely new paragraphs 
>have been written, adding _someone else's_ opinion!
>

     You have a legitimate complaint. Had there been more time, a rewrite
of some areas would have been requested. We shall try to do better in the
future.


>Even worse, in some 
>cases incorrect information has replaced what was originally correct 
>(ie, I stated the game requires 1MB RAM, it was changed to say it 
>requires 2MB RAM). ....

     Incorrect information? The review heading states: "Freeware for 2MB
IIgs". To run the game under System 6 requires more than 1MB. 


Rubywand