[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Goodbye HFS.FST (crashed HD again)

Subject: Re: Goodbye HFS.FST (crashed HD again)
From: nugundam@netcom.com (Joseph Lee)
Date: 1996/09/13
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
References: <50sp3a$29q@zap.io.org> <50t3pg$nd8@europa.frii.com> <50tn3q$j7b@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> <19960912003959273168@dempson.actrix.gen.nz>
Sender: nugundam@netcom2.netcom.com

David Empson (dempson@actrix.gen.nz) wrote:
: Someone claimed that the HFS FST is also writing data in reverse order
: for multi-block transfers.  This would have a significant speed penalty,
: as most drivers and devices are optimised for writes in ascending order.

Could this writing the little-endian bytes in reverse order to make them
big-endian order on the disk?
-- 
Joseph  /================+========+=============+============================\
   nugundam@netcom.com   | Kronos |  Anime Expo | Cal-Animage Epsilon (Anime) >
-------------------------+--------+     '97     | Engineering Tower TEC #201  >
II(> Creative 'Ware <)II |  IIGS  | Los Angeles |   Thursdays, 7pm - 10pm    /

References:
- Goodbye HFS.FST (crashed HD again)
  - From: crownmi@zap.io.org (Myles Fudge)
- Re: Goodbye HFS.FST (crashed HD again)
  - From: shack@deimos.frii.com (Randy Shackelford)
- Re: Goodbye HFS.FST (crashed HD again)
  - From: johnlb@primenet.com (John Bowling)
- Re: Goodbye HFS.FST (crashed HD again)
  - From: dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson)

Prev by Date: Re: MED, OctaMED, Protracker
Next by Date: Re: CD of all Files on Asimov
Previous by thread: Re: Goodbye HFS.FST (crashed HD again)
Next by thread: Re: Goodbye HFS.FST (crashed HD again)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread