[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Strange (whoops!) //c problems
- Subject: Re: Strange (whoops!) //c problems
- From: turtle@wwa.com (Gary)
- Date: 1996/08/18
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: WorldWide Access (tm) - Chicagoland Internet Services (http://www.wwa.com)
- References: <4ur93k$cce@balsam.unca.edu> <3211C68D.73FC@esis.vsnet.ch> <4uts00$i3i@balsam.unca.edu> <4uu0cs$mcf@balsam.unca.edu> <4v5uqk$3g0@europa.frii.com>
shack@frii.com (Randy Shackelford) wrote:
>Rhonda K. Faircloth (RKFAIRCLOTH@unca.edu) wrote:
>: My //c is the oldest version, PEEK(64447) returns 255, not 0.
>: So I guess I sorta re-ask the question about the forever-loopiness of
>: this ROM version: Is "no bad news" the same as "System OK"?
>16K ROM //c's don't have a self test if that's what you're talking about.
>So not getting a "System OK" is neither good nor bad.
>--
>Randy Shackelford I was internet
>shack@frii.com when internet wasn't cool