Re: What's about the 65832 ?

[jreiter@comet.net (Jordan Reiter)]

In article <4ujuhi$k05@nnrp1.news.primenet.com>, johnlb@primenet.com (John
Bowling) wrote:

>In article <4uik6i$n58@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu>,
>Gary Sutton <cvotter@prairienet.org> wrote:
>>Nathan Mates (nathan@visi.com) wrote:
>>: In article <320B584A.6932@esis.vsnet.ch>,
>>: Gilles Tschopp  <gilles.tschopp@esis.vsnet.ch> wrote:
>>: >I'm buliding a French Web Site about the computer history.
>>: >I would like to get a maximum of informations about the myth
>>: >of the 65832, the successor of the 65816.
>>: >Is it never build ?
>>: 
>>:    Never produced, and I don't think it got designed beyond a
>>: general idea. (No layouts)
>>: 
>>
>>Only time I ever saw it mentioned was a quick little editor's note in 
>>some issue of Nibble (miss that mag).  They also mentioned the 65265 
>>which was supposed to be lise a Cray on a chip, and GS compatible.
>
>The 65265 is a real chip, though nothing like a Cray on a chip.  It is GS
>software compatable, but is designed as a single chip computer, with
>4 UARTS, 2 sign wave generators, timers, parrallel I/O, etc. all on the
>chip.  Due to pin limitations, if you want to use very much external
>memory, you have to give up some of the above features.
>
>They are planning on going to 20MHz with it eventually.
How would you go about attaching it to a IIgs?

Toby Reiter

#@Flame Fests lead to Flame feasts!!
*&Resist the temptation: Don't feed Henrik!!