Re: Calling a bluff...

[nathan@cco.caltech.edu (Nathan Mates)]

In article <4ub6og$hjc@bmerhc5e.bnr.ca>,
Jeffrey Robertson <jeffr@bnr.ca> wrote:
>In article <4u4442$1sr@news.wco.com>, Charles T. Turley <owsw@aol.com> wrote:
>>Nathan - you need not go on and on with anything more!  My server has 
>>completed an accurate trace and I'll be discussing it all with you via a 
>>conf. call to you at work tomorrow before noon. I suggest you accept the 
>>call and assist with the criminal investigation - to the best of your 
>>abilities.

>Nathan:  Please post with an account of this call -- if it does/did occur.
>         Was it the FBI, the CIA, or The Company?  :-)

   Turley was mistaken. That "accurate trace" he posted about before
the call wasn't. (A second call a day later had different results from
what he said, though I don't care whose names are mentioned-- if
there's anyone guilty and traced, the police can deal with them
according to the laws of this country.) He's already apologized here,
and thinks he knows now who did it. I don't care too much, except to
make sure that accusations spoken of too hastily are retracted.

   As I said at the beginning, I didn't do it. The facts are bearing
that out.

Nathan Mates

-- 
<*> Nathan Mates http://www.ugcs.caltech.edu/~nathan/      <*>
# And he said to them, "To you has been given the secret of the
# Kingdom of God, but for those outside, everything comes in 
# parables" Mark 4:11, NRSV