[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Moderation
- Subject: Re: Moderation
- From: wbaguhn@nyx10.cs.du.edu (Will Baguhn)
- Date: 1996/07/21
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: I am the error in apps of delight
- References: <4se4qs$44r@crl2.crl.com> <4sebok$ou6@blackice.winternet.com> <AE10492996687E80E@ts1-09.aug.com> <4sm9jr$152@bmerhc5e.bnr.ca>
In article <4sm9jr$152@bmerhc5e.bnr.ca>,
Jeffrey Robertson <jeffr@bnr.ca> wrote:
>In article <AE10492996687E80E@ts1-09.aug.com>,
>Rick Hatton <hattonr@aug.com> wrote:
>>It takes more than one person to start a flame war. Why not just ignore the
>>inappropriate posts?. We have filters for our newsreaders, and I certainly
>>use mine.
>
>It is hard to filter incorrect information. New arrivals might not
>know that Dr. Tom is not to be trusted/believed. They won't have
>him in a killfile.
>
>Hmmm.. maybe that should be in the FAQ...
>--
>-------------------------------------+----------------+-----------------
>Jeffrey Robertson | jeffr@bnr.ca | BNR, Ottawa
>"I speak for myself, not BNR" - Me +----------------+ (Meriline)
>"Verbing weirds language" - Calvin OC-48 FiberWorld
Now now. Dr. Tom can be quite helpful sometimes. Singling him out is
unfair, there is PLENTY of bad advice floating around...
I think that a MUCH better way of warning the newbies is:
"Note that there may be statements made that are questionable in
either factual content or legality, as well as some that are just
plain wrong. If you have some inkling of a clue as to what's
going on, then take responses to questions with a grain of salt..
otherwise, look for at least another post corroborating whatever
was stated. Of course, if you're foolish, crazy, or just full of
self-hate, ignore this warning..."
--
--- Rev. SPQR (wbaguhn@nyx.net)