[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: New Apple II (was Apple's next move ...)

Subject: Re: New Apple II (was Apple's next move ...)
From: be063@torfree.net (Johnny Lau)
Date: 1996/05/19
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: Toronto Free-Net
References: <Pine.BSD/.3.91.960517105455.9071B-100000@ns1.net-gate.com> <4njepc$rhj@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <jdwong.832389693@nlsgi2> <jdwong-1805960202370001@berlin-5.slip.uiuc.edu>

Jim Wong (jdwong@nlsgi2.ncsa.uiuc.edu) wrote:
: But the idea that the Apple II platform is, though some freak alignment
: of the stars, more viable than Macintosh is completely ludicrous.

: (Note: I said "more viable", not "better").

Mind you, if Apple keeps up what they've been doing, that is, what they 
have not been doing with the Macintosh and the PowerPC lately, then they 
may very well join the Apple II in Silicon Heaven soon. Oh well.
--

References:
- Re: New Apple II (was Apple's next move ...)
  - From: Forrest <forrest@ns1.net-gate.com>
- Re: New Apple II (was Apple's next move ...)
  - From: rubywand@aol.com (RUBYWAND)
- Re: New Apple II (was Apple's next move ...)
  - From: jdwong@nlsgi2.ncsa.uiuc.edu (Jim Wong)
- Re: New Apple II (was Apple's next move ...)
  - From: jdwong@nlsgi2.ncsa.uiuc.edu (Jim Wong)

Prev by Date: Zip-GS speed and cache
Next by Date: nulib binary somewhere?
Previous by thread: Re: New Apple II (was Apple's next move ...)
Next by thread: Re: New Apple II (was Apple's next move ...)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread