[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: New Apple II (was Apple's next move ...)

Subject: Re: New Apple II (was Apple's next move ...)
From: jd-wong@uiuc.edu (Jim Wong)
Date: 1996/05/07
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: University of Illinois
References: <Pine.PMDF.3.91.960501231709.1615067748C-100000@ewu.edu> <4mm0sk$4ov@newsbf02.news.aol.com>

In article <4mm0sk$4ov@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, rubywand@aol.com (RUBYWAND)
wrote:

>      Attempts by Mac users to run GS software are admirable. However,
> settling for a IIgs based on a doomed platform is not a very attractive
> offer.

The "doomed platform" being the Apple II?

-- 
Jim Wong (jd-wong@uiuc.edu)

References:
- Re: New Apple II (was Apple's next move ...)
  - From: "Ian K. Erickson" <ierickson@ewu.edu>
- Re: New Apple II (was Apple's next move ...)
  - From: rubywand@aol.com (RUBYWAND)

Prev by Date: Re: AW info needed
Next by Date: Re: BASIS 108 anyone?
Previous by thread: Re: New Apple II (was Apple's next move ...)
Next by thread: Re: New Apple II (was Apple's next move ...)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread