Re: Turing Test Meaningless?

[rubywand@aol.com (RUBYWAND)]

In article <4m2h2k$m8f@nntp.seflin.lib.fl.us>,
z007400b@bcfreenet.seflin.lib.fl.us (Ralph Silverman) writes:

>: this isn't comp.ai .  this is comp.sys.apple2, remember.  i know that i
>: have been yelling at ralph via email f for this getting here, but come
on..
>: don't reply to them on c.s.a2... hmm?
>
>--
>***********begin r.s. response*************
>
>	those who are interested in such
>	things
>		might ask
>	why accept the
>		authority
>	of the poster cited above?
>
>	also
>	yes,
>	have been getting flamed via email
>	left and right for this and the like...
>
>***********end r.s. response***************

==== begin rw response =====

     why accept this authority?
     good question! what is your
        answer?

     getting flamed via email
        is a drag.
       too bad, r.s.;
        computers
         who play
       at passing
     Turing's test often
       get flamed.

==== end rw response =====


Rubywand