[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Turing Test Meaningless?
- Subject: Re: Turing Test Meaningless?
- From: nathan@cco.caltech.edu (Nathan Mates)
- Date: 1996/05/03
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
- References: <4lgnj3$n9@nntp.seflin.lib.fl.us> <4m2h2k$m8f@nntp.seflin.lib.fl.us> <4m6qdu$49j@nyx10.cs.du.edu> <Pine.SGI.3.91r.960502110906.22332A-100000@freenet>
In article <Pine.SGI.3.91r.960502110906.22332A-100000@freenet>,
David J. Gadow <gadowv@freenet.msp.mn.us> wrote:
>> comp.sys.apple2 for the most part isn't interested in comp.ai.* . those
>> that ARE interested can see it in comp.ai.* .
>If you think getting all this in csa2 is bad, you'll be tickled pink to
>know that they are showing up in even more esoteric plasces like
>rec.arts.drwho and alt.tv.x-files. Now THAT'S off topic for sure!
Sure seems like yet another BBS that got on the internet before the
admins had a clue. Time to start mailing the admins to put their minds
in gear before engaging fingers.
Nathan Mates
--
<*> Nathan Mates http://www.ugcs.caltech.edu/~nathan/ <*>
# And he said to them, "To you has been given the secret of the
# Kingdom of God, but for those outside, everything comes in
# parables" Mark 4:11, NRSV