[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why is GS ROM0 called WOZ signature
- Subject: Re: Why is GS ROM0 called WOZ signature
- From: shack@onyx.southwind.net (Randy Shackelford)
- Date: 1996/04/29
- Distribution: world
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: SouthWind Internet Access, Inc.
- References: <4lkeno$h83@elbe.do.isst.fhg.de> <4lo39o$mp9@maverick.tad.eds.com> <4lqs3j$p3g@maverick.tad.eds.com> <4lr02u$ikn@opal.southwind.net> <4lv7qq$f23@news.ios.com>
Eric Dietrich (madscientist@treebranch.com) wrote:
: In article <4lr02u$ikn@opal.southwind.net> Randy Shackelford,
: shack@onyx.southwind.net writes:
: >Also not all ROM 0s were signature editions. The IIgs was in production
: for
: >about a year before ROM 01 came out and signature editions were all
: early in
: >production. I was surprised to get one when I got my IIgs in March '87.
: And that also dosen't account for folks who have traded hardware and
: swapped motherboards. For instance, I have a ROM 03 in my Woz case. When
: I
: traded up my ROM 01 machine, I kept it 'cause the new case looked barren
: without it.
So did I, I also have a signature edition ROM 3. That's neither here nor there
since we're talking about how many and when signature editions were made, not
what ROM versions they all have this long after leaving the factory. All
signature editions were ROM 0 but not all ROM 0s were signature editions,
that's what I was saying.
--
Randy Shackelford I was internet
shack@southwind.net when internet wasn't cool