[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Apple's next move (was Apple II just won't die.)

Subject: Re: Apple's next move (was Apple II just won't die.)
From: GUDATH@EZINFO.VMSMAIL.ETHZ.CH (Henrik 'Boris Grishenko' Gudat)
Date: 1996/03/28
Distribution: world
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: Synergetix
References: <4j8d8p$7mu@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4jbguf$3pi$1@mhadg.production.compuserve.com>

In <4jbguf$3pi$1@mhadg.production.compuserve.com> Tom writes:

>  >Today's home user would welcome a machine that
>  >(3) is _not_ PC compatible 
> 
> Help me out here. Why would the home user prefer a system that is 
> unable to run 90% of all the software in the world?

Because those 10% are exactly what I need.

- henrik :-)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Apple's next move (was Apple II just won't die.)
  - From: gsutton@kendaco.telebyte.com (gsutton)

References:
- Apple's next move (was Apple II just won't die.)
  - From: rubywand@aol.com (RUBYWAND)
- Re: Apple's next move (was Apple II just won't die.)
  - From: Tom Zuchowski <71214.1670@CompuServe.COM>

Prev by Date: Re: Apple's next move (was Apple II just won't die.)
Next by Date: Apple IIe Xmode
Previous by thread: Re: Apple's next move (was Apple II just won't die.)
Next by thread: Re: Apple's next move (was Apple II just won't die.)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread