[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Difference between 6502 & 65C02
- Subject: Re: Difference between 6502 & 65C02
- From: jkeim@unlinfo.unl.edu (james keim)
- Date: 1996/03/26
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: SEEDNET InterNetNews News System
- References: <96082.140914JCA31@maine.maine.edu> <4ivrqj$lca@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> <4ivuv4$rlc@crl11.crl.com> <4j2dk1$6h0@nnrp1.news.primenet.com>
John Bowling (johnlb@primenet.com) wrote:
: I don't have any reference books on these anymore, but from what I recall
: there were a half dozen processors between 6501 and 6510, and the primary
: differences were the number of pins and how much memory they addressed.
: A few may have contained internal RAM/ROM. It doesn't seem like a 6503
: would be software compatable with the IIe (designed years before the
: 65C02, as were all 65xx processors [without the C]) so it was probably a 40
: pin 6502 with internal RAM/ROM. Possibly used because Apple found a
: bunch of them surplus and wanted to save some money.
: It can't be 65C02 compatable unless it was designated a 65C03, and I
: don't recall ever hearing about such a chip.
: John
John--
There was some discussion of this some time ago on Genie. I don't
remember all the details but I think the kernel of the discussion was
that one company started calling their 65c02 a 6503--probably just to
make things a little confusing. As I remember, they are basically the
same chip.
Harold Hislop would know for sure if he is anywhere around. I'm sure
he was one of the principle parties discussing this chip.
--James Keim