[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Micro$loth Windoze 95 Badges - how they should be
- Subject: Re: Micro$loth Windoze 95 Badges - how they should be
- From: jd-wong@uiuc.edu (Jim Wong)
- Date: 1995/09/08
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc, comp.sys.mac.hardware.misc, aus.computers.ibm-pc, aus.computers.sun, aus.computers.os2, aus.computers.amiga, comp.sys.amiga.misc, comp.sys.apple2, comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc, comp.sys.intel, comp.sys.mac.programmer.misc, comp.sys.misc, comp.sys.newton.mi
- Organization: University of Illinois
- References: <Pine.ULT.3.91.950904132020.12842B-100000@student.uq.edu.au> <42f93k$chn@data.interserv.net> <demo-0509952118130001@netblazer1-s35.telalink.net> <42lktk$b5k@itchy.itsnet.com> <camin-0609952252120001@0.0.0.0> <42o4f8$9qt@news-2.csn.net> <42pml7$9gc@adam.telalink.net> <42q2bg$7mv@news-2.csn.net>
In article <42q2bg$7mv@news-2.csn.net>, bazyar@hypermall.com (Jawaid
Bazyar) wrote:
> Why should Microsoft expend effort to do what is essentially technical
> support for some other company's products? If Apple can't get it right,
> screw 'em.
On the other hand, why should Apple expend effort providing support for
other company's products?
Call me crazy, but it seems reasonable to expect the hardware vendor to
produce drivers for his products.
--
Jim Wong (jd-wong@uiuc.edu)