[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Micro$loth Windoze 95 Badges - how they should be
- Subject: Re: Micro$loth Windoze 95 Badges - how they should be
- From: jsart@ix.netcom.com (Joel Sartoris)
- Date: 1995/09/07
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc, comp.sys.mac.hardware.misc, aus.computers.ibm-pc, aus.computers.sun, aus.computers.os2, aus.computers.amiga, comp.sys.amiga.misc, comp.sys.apple2, comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc, comp.sys.intel, comp.sys.mac.programmer.misc, comp.sys.misc, comp.sys.newton.misc, comp.sys.next.misc, comp.sys.sgi.misc, comp.sys.sun.misc, comp.os.ms-windows.misc, comp.os.ms-windows.win95.setup, comp.windows.misc, comp.os.ms-windows.win95.misc
- Organization: Netcom
- References: <Pine.ULT.3.91.950904132020.12842B-100000@student.uq.edu.au> <42f93k$chn@data.interserv.net> <erik-0409951259280001@192.0.2.1> <42g0e7$kvs@itchy.itsnet.com> <jdoe-0409952145240001@m13.mccabe.swarthmore.edu> <42ipft$9ko@data.interserv.net> <camin-0709950919110001@ppp-01-uf-cs1.nerdc.ufl.edu>
jdoe@somewhere.edu (me) wrote:
>
> Market share and performance are frequently unrelated in this world,
> particularly in the case of OS's. It is the consensus of most
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> experts that OS/2 Warp and Mac OS are definitely superior operating
> systems to Win95.
I certainly hope that it is a "consensus of most". Is it also deja
vu all over again?
--Joel Sartoris