[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Micro$loth Windoze 95 Badges - how they should be



In article <G.Vaughn-0409952337390001@slip-31-7.ots.utexas.edu> G.Vaughn@ttu.edu (Greg Vaughn) writes:

>I'll have to agree that Micro$loth is much better at marketing than Apple,
>but I still believe that Apple has more ingenuitive ideas and better
>programmers. If Apple plays its cards right, it can actually benefit from
>Win95. Since so many users will have to buy new hardware to run it, then
>maybe Apple can sway them to Macs. After all, since all of the reviews of
>Win95 comment on how it is more Mac-like, then maybe Apple can convince
>people to go ahead a buy the real thing since they need new hardware and
>new versions of software to actually use Win95.

Yes, but the crucial question is this--how much does it cost the typical 
Windows 3.11 PC owner to upgrade to '95 vs. the cost of a new Mac or PowerMac? 
 Granted, a Mac system offers big savings in time and effort by its ease of 
configuration and usage, but the upfront cost and compatibility issues are 
also important.  8 MB additional RAM, at $250 or so, costs a lot less than a 
PowerMac, and the typical Windows user's existing software packages could be 
used for a while before upgrading to '95 software versions (either software 
upgrade path--Mac or '95--can be expensive--and SoftWindows is not really an 
option).  Also, compatibility is an important matter, as not everyone 
likes going through Apple File Exchange . . .

Trent Stevens  71172.535@compuserve.com
Mac lover, but '95 user