Re: Electronic Apple II Journal?

[cust_ts@cc.Helsinki.FI (Tero Sand)]

In article <427hnh$cjh@opal.southwind.net>,
Randy Shackelford <shack@onyx.southwind.net> wrote:
>Matt Portune (mportune@telerama.lm.com) wrote:
>: > 	It's a good idea, but one flaw I can see, is what about those of 
>: > us who don't have a second sight card?  
>
>: I don't mean to sound harsh, but... buy one.  The II developers are 
>: working their asses off for a reason, and they should be supported.  If 
>: we want the II to be pushed into the 21st century, we have to push the 
>: II.  Take advantage of the new hardware.  If you can't afford it, then start 
>: saving.  It may take awhile, but it's worth it.  Again, please don't take 
>: this the wrong way.
>
>Sounds like a Paul Statt article from inCider in years gone by. He said vote
>with your wallet, buy everything put out so people will keep making stuff.
[cut]

And I agree Statt was wrong. However, this isn't quite the same thing.
The issue was: produce a "flashy" WWW-based magazine. One could settle
for the text only via lynx, but if one wanted all the "flash," one
should download the issue and use a SS-viewer. That's how I understood
it, anyway.
I don't necessarily agree with this, either, but you're making a faulty
comparison. Something which I hate.

>Randy Shackelford                                 I was internet
-- 
Tero Sand, 2 kyu (4k*)		! "We have become... the stewards of life's
				! continuity on Earth. We did not ask for this
EMail: cust_ts@cc.helsinki.fi	! role, but we cannot abjure it. We may not be
       custts@cc.helsinki.fi	! suited for it, but here we are." -S.J. Gould