[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Apple II+ - "all" memory bad... surely not?

Subject: Re: Apple II+ - "all" memory bad... surely not?
From: rich12345 <aiiadict@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:40:25 -0800 (PST)
Complaints-to: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-info: g28g2000prb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=71.143.3.218; posting-account=5kmk9wkAAAB22-WWGK8UTn8vQ5c3EvdQ
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: http://groups.google.com
References: <c9597830-88f6-4ef5-ad12-6bd33883e57b@19g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>
User-agent: G2/1.0
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:14674

On Mar 12, 9:29 pm, "N.N. Thayer" <nntha...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> \ I find it hard to believe that
> *all* of it is bad... assuming that's not the case, what other sorts
> of conditions would cause such a test result?

video output is read directly from RAM
RAMTEST software gets loaded to RAM


try lifting all chips up, reseat them.  Maybe intermittent contact on
a data or address line of CPU?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Apple II+ - "all" memory bad... surely not?
  - From: "N.N. Thayer" <nnthayer@hotmail.com>

References:
- Apple II+ - "all" memory bad... surely not?
  - From: "N.N. Thayer" <nnthayer@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: Apple II+ - "all" memory bad... surely not?
Next by Date: Re: Identifying an Apple II SCSI Card
Previous by thread: Apple II+ - "all" memory bad... surely not?
Next by thread: Re: Apple II+ - "all" memory bad... surely not?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread