Re: Faxination update .6 just as bad as .5

[snelson@news.uiowa.edu (Steven Nelson)]

>  
>           I would disagree with this as for the first time I can reliably
> send one page faxes and the received quality is better than faxes
> delivered from another "FAX" machine. I haven't tried the receiving part
> yet and have noticed perhaps "faxination log full" message even though I
> have a 6 meg + Rom 3 with a Zip 8/16. I hope we will eventially be able to
> send more than one page at a time as right now this precludes sending a
> cover page. There may be light at the end of the tunnel.
>  
>           pbauer@mit.edu
> 

Ahhh! What light through yonder message does make! (sic)   Sooo... that is
why I can send a cover page or a 1 page fax, but never both, with v1.0.6.

But...but... why is that?  Why is there a 1 page MAX fax with faxination?

Incidently, I can send a 1 page fax with v1.0.6. v1.0, v1.02, v1.04, v1.05
wouldn't work.  v1.03 would send a fax, but it had other problems.  So,
v1.06 is closer, but still not good enough.  GS Rom3 + 4Meg QRam + ZipGS
8/64 + HS scsi/Quantum LPS105 & LineLink 144e modem.
System 6.0.1 + Pointless, SixPack, etc.

I must make a complete list of active files in SetUps folder, DA's and
Extras.  My machine crashes to monitor when I activate 'receive fax' :(

  --Steve  (steven-nelson@uiowa.edu)