[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Apple IIc vs Apple IIc+
In article 801168922@tbp.eng.iastate.edu, ddkilzer@iastate.edu (David D Kilzer) writes:
> msaedi@u.washington.edu (Maziar Mike Saedi) writes:
>
> >Would someone be kind enough to enlighten me on the differences between
> >the Apple IIc and IIc+?
>
> Check the comp.sys.apple2 FAQ for the definitive answer, but basically,
> the //c+ had a 3.5" internal drive where the //c had a 5.25" internal
> drive. The //c+ also ran at 4(?) MHz (with a switch to bring it down to
> ~1 MHz--the original speed of Apple // computers) while the //c only ran
> at 1 Mhz.
>
> Dave
> --
> David D. Kilzer \ Emergency Holographic Doctor:
> ddkilzer@iastate.edu / ``Don't worry, I'm not going to kiss you.
> Computer Engineer 4 \ I'm only adjusting the restraint.''
> Iowa State University, Ames / _Star_Trek_Voyager:__Phage_
=============================================
The IIc+ was Apple's answer to the Laser 128, which contained many
desirable features not in the IIc+ or IIe.
Sabu