[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ZipGS or Second Sight????

Subject: Re: ZipGS or Second Sight????
From: mportune@telerama.lm.com (Matt Portune)
Date: 1995/05/25
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: Telerama Public Access Internet, Pittsburgh, PA
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950522002943.16049A-100000@taurus.oac.uci.edu> <erik-2305951011180001@192.0.2.1>

Erik Kloeppel (erik@hypermall.com) wrote:
> The real bottleneck on the IIGS is that dratted 1MHZ data bus.  I'll
> accept it on the ROM 1, but with the advent of the ROM 3 they could have
> implemented the NuBUS at least.

Oh hell, they probably did that on those ROM 04's.

-- 
      /--- Matt Portune --------------------- pGSi 16/64 (loaded) -------\
      |  mportune@telerama.lm.com           Modular Euphoria MIDIStudio  | 
      |  ae094@dayton.wright.edu            Blue Monday BBS              |
      \------------- "The Computer is a drug, not a tool" ---------------/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ZipGS or Second Sight????
  - From: erik@hypermall.com (Erik Kloeppel)
- Re: ZipGS or Second Sight????
  - From: toddpw@liquefy.ugcs.caltech.edu (Todd P. Whitesel)

References:
- Re: ZipGS or Second Sight????
  - From: "Someone@Somewhere" <eaeu899@taurus.oac.uci.edu>
- Re: ZipGS or Second Sight????
  - From: erik@hypermall.com (Erik Kloeppel)

Prev by Date: Re: II Alive
Next by Date: Re: ZipGS or Second Sight????
Previous by thread: Re: ZipGS or Second Sight????
Next by thread: Re: ZipGS or Second Sight????
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread