[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Shocking: RF SCSI slower than HS SCSI???

Subject: Re: Shocking: RF SCSI slower than HS SCSI???
From: jlee@ics.uci.edu (Orion Pax)
Date: 8 Mar 1995 23:10:11 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: Creative 'Ware @ University of California, Irvine
References: <866584557wnr@contech.demon.co.uk> <bazyarD50vpF.sx@netcom.com> <808631676wnr@contech.demon.co.uk> <bazyarD52uy7.JJ8@netcom.com> <3jjbu0$m1f@paris.ics.uci.edu> <bazyarD54wBF.6wG@netcom.com>

Jawaid Bazyar (bazyar@netcom.com) wrote:
: jlee@ics.uci.edu (Orion Pax) writes:
: >So will the ramfast support gs/os directory caching sometime?  IMO, this
: >would reduce a lot of hd trashing I hear.

:   I'm having trouble parsing that sentence.  Regardless, having 

Yes I do mean it in both ways that the sentence can be interpreted. ^_^

Joseph
--
jlee@clyde.ics.uci.edu   | Have you watched your Koko wa GreenWood, Yotoden,
-------------------------+ Gundam 0083, Bubble Gum Crisis/Crash!, Video Girl
II(> Creative 'Ware <)II | Ai, Tenchi Miyou, Ah! My Goddess, Maison Ikkoku,
 Cal-Animage Epsilon VP  | PatLabor, Ranma 1/2, and Five Star Stories today?

References:
- Shocking: RF SCSI slower than HS SCSI???
  - From: Sbehrens@contech.demon.co.uk (Soenke Behrens)
- Re: Shocking: RF SCSI slower than HS SCSI???
  - From: bazyar@netcom.com (Jawaid Bazyar)
- Re: Shocking: RF SCSI slower than HS SCSI???
  - From: Sbehrens@contech.demon.co.uk (Soenke Behrens)
- Re: Shocking: RF SCSI slower than HS SCSI???
  - From: bazyar@netcom.com (Jawaid Bazyar)
- Re: Shocking: RF SCSI slower than HS SCSI???
  - From: jlee@ics.uci.edu (Orion Pax)
- Re: Shocking: RF SCSI slower than HS SCSI???
  - From: bazyar@netcom.com (Jawaid Bazyar)

Prev by Date: Re: Where can I get a copy of ProSEL 16?
Next by Date: Re: LogicWorks, Inc. CD-ROM
Previous by thread: Re: Shocking: RF SCSI slower than HS SCSI???
Next by thread: Re: Shocking: RF SCSI slower than HS SCSI???
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread