[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Which would you keep: ZipGSX or TWGS?

Subject: Re: Which would you keep: ZipGSX or TWGS?
From: sporadic <sporadically@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:42:28 -0800 (PST)
Complaints-to: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-info: j14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=134.134.139.72; posting-account=rue-bQoAAAB43Wix_GI7NJVeXYeDNscf
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: http://groups.google.com
References: <1a4b340e-e2ce-4885-b5a6-e7fb088f4944@j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com> <8cc243d0-f879-4ee9-a853-77926c010d94@j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com> <20f97638-445f-45ba-8542-12e7239b9311@p24g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
User-agent: G2/1.0
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:13658

On Jan 18, 9:37 am, Drew <goggled...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Have put benchmark v5 here:-
>
> www.drew2gs.com/files
>
> Cheers
> Drew

Thanks Drew, I'll check it out this week and post the results.  TWGS
is has more hardware (10Mhz/32K) than the ZipGS (8MHz/16K) and I'm
going to see if someone at work can solder a socket on the Zip so I
can swap the oscillator, put in a new 65816 and take it to 64K cache
as well.

I'm running a stock psu, but a few cards (Apple HS SCSI in slot 1,
SuperSonic in slot 2, TWgs in slot 4, MicroDrive in slot 7, and a 6MB
GS RAM+) in a ROM 1, with a System Saver GS w/ upgraded fan.  So far
it's been stable. :)

Jimmy

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Which would you keep: ZipGSX or TWGS?
  - From: Polymorph <mike.a.stephens@gmail.com>

References:
- Which would you keep: ZipGSX or TWGS?
  - From: sporadic <sporadically@gmail.com>
- Re: Which would you keep: ZipGSX or TWGS?
  - From: Drew <goggledrew@gmail.com>
- Re: Which would you keep: ZipGSX or TWGS?
  - From: Drew <goggledrew@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: How to open AppleMouse IIe?
Next by Date: Re: Buying equipment?
Previous by thread: Re: Which would you keep: ZipGSX or TWGS?
Next by thread: Re: Which would you keep: ZipGSX or TWGS?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread