[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Which would you keep: ZipGSX or TWGS?

To: Michael J. Mahon
Subject: Re: Which would you keep: ZipGSX or TWGS?
From: "sfahey" <sfahey@a2central.com.remove-w0j-this>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 13:34:51 -0600
In-reply-to: <xdqdneKqKqlZcMnWnZ2dnUVZ_udi4p2d@giganews.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: A2Central.com
References: <xdqdneKqKqlZcMnWnZ2dnUVZ_udi4p2d@giganews.com>
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:13667

  To: Michael J. Mahon
  Re: Re: Which would you keep: ZipGSX or TWGS?
  By: Michael J. Mahon to comp.sys.apple2 on Mon Jan 18 2010 03:24 pm

 > Voodoo?  Cache technology is quite mature...so what kind of voodoo?

I think he was alluding to what's going on in the ASIC.


Sean Fahey
www.a2central.com
bbs.a2central.com

References:
- Re: Which would you keep: ZipGSX or TWGS?
  - From: "Michael J. Mahon" <mjmahon@aol.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Scanning cards (for Alex)
Next by Date: New Apple II videos on youtube.com
Previous by thread: Re: Which would you keep: ZipGSX or TWGS?
Next by thread: Serial Link between Mac and IIgs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread