[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: wanted:info on IIe extension
- Subject: Re: wanted:info on IIe extension
- From: nparker@cie-2.uoregon.edu (Neil Parker)
- Date: 20 Sep 1994 01:04:14 GMT
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: University of Oregon Campus Information Exchange
- References: <35l48j$gdj@maxwell5.ee>
In article <35l48j$gdj@maxwell5.ee> dpscholn@mtu.edu (Dan P. Scholnik) writes:
> I just popped in the IIe entension chips, but I don't know a
>couple things. 1. Where is the new(old) mini-assembler found? It's
>apparently not at F666h.
The mini-assembler had to be moved away from $F666, since that space is now
pretty much irrevocably claimed by Applesoft. I believe it now resides
somewhere in the $C800 space, along with the 80-column firmware.
Fortunately, though, you don't need to know its address anymore. Just type
an exclamation point (!) at the * prompt and press RETURN.
> 2. Since I have never had nor ussed Prodos, I
>am using dos 3.3 - any conflicts likely?
DOS 3.3 itself works just fine on the enhanced ROMs. There may be a few
programs that fail, though, because they use undocumented ROM entry points
that were changed in the enhanced ROMs.
> 3. ANything else important to
>note about the ROM upgrade? Interrupts and the such I know are changed.
>4. I don't have a 65c02 data sheet, and although I know most of the
>new modes/instructions, I was unsure about STZ, I think, and TSB.
I'll let somebody else tackle these. (I'm typing this in my office at
school, and all my Apple II info is at home.)
- Neil Parker
--
Neil Parker No cute ASCII art...no cute quote...no cute
nparker@cie-2.uoregon.edu disclaimer...no deposit, no return...
nparker@cie.uoregon.edu (This space intentionally left blank: )