[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: DSP
- Subject: Re: DSP
- From: taob@ionews.io.org (Brian Tao)
- Date: 12 Nov 1993 18:19:47 -0500
- Distribution: world
- In-reply-to: kpopple@imp.sim.es.com (Ken Poppleton)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: Terran Exobiology Research Institute, 1-800-GO-ALIEN
- References: <2brien$c41@cnn.sim.es.com>
- Reply-to: taob@io.org (Brian Tao)
In article <2brien$c41@cnn.sim.es.com>, Ken Poppleton writes...
>
> The DSP processor board will have a Motorola DSP56002 40Mhz processor
^^^^^^^^
Isn't this the expensive 32-bit model? I thought you had decided to
use the 24-bit 56001 to keep costs down?
> For those who want to use the DSP as a fast math coprocessor, it is
> very good for integer math but is about 8 times slower than the 68882
> floating point coprocessors at doing floating point math.
Can you integrate a 68882 socket in the design, or as an add-on
module where the FP operations could be re-routed? Or is that way too
expensive?
--
Brian Tao:: taob@io.org (Internex Online, 416-363-3783, 27 lines, v.32bis)
::::::::::: 90taobri@wave.scar.utoronto.ca (University of Toronto, 9T4)
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: DSP
- From: fmlin@netcom.com (Fist of Fury)
- Re: DSP
- From: kpopple@imp.sim.es.com (Ken Poppleton)
- References:
- Re: DSP
- From: kpopple@imp.sim.es.com (Ken Poppleton)