[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: System 6.0.1 docs
In <lul9i5INNils@libyan.cs.utexas.edu> fredp@cs.utexas.edu (Fred William Peterson) writes:
>I think I heard somewhere that System 6.0.1 will be the final IIGS
>system software upgrade. If that is true (and please don't flame
>me if it's not), then will Apple be fully documenting the still-
>undocumented bits, like FSTs, etc.? Releasing the source code?
>I hope Apple will do that, so that the system software can continue
>to be supported, by the users if not by the manufacturer. It would
>be a shame for it to stay forever stuck in 1993.
I hope not!!
Now, before people have a cow, let me continue: I think Apple should turn
over the source code for the System Software to someone -- NOT NOT NOT to
the public domain or whatever. They should find a reputable person or
group of people to turn it over to; making it public would lead to utter
chaos and would probably destroy any chances of the IIGS continuing to
have a good system.
>I hope the Apple people are listening and will consider this small
>request.
So do I.
>Fred Peterson (fredp@cs.utexas.edu) a.k.a. "Bjorn Nitmo"
--
Eric D. Shepherd | Apple II Alliance Charter Member
InterNet: uerics@mcl.mcl.ucsb.edu | ACM Member
FidoNet: 1:206/2713 Eric Shepherd | Programming Law #2: If it works
AOL: Sheppy | the first time, something's wrong.